Picture
Thursday, Australian Prime Minister Julia Gillard delivered a historic national apology in Parliament. She apologised for the treatment of unmarried mothers in Australia. From the late 1940s until the 1980s many unmarried mothers in Australia had their babies forcibly adopted.The news is shocking and seems incredible in the 21st Century. Perhaps it is the fact that it is a country such as Australia why it is all the more shocking. No third world country here but rather a civilised nation.

In the Great Hall of Parliament House Gillard speaking for former governments of Austyralia apologised. In the audience were some of the people directly affected by the forced adoption policy.

Japan Times reports GIllard saying "Today this Parliament, on behalf of the Australian people, takes responsibility and apologizes for the policies and practices that forced the separation of mothers from their babies, which created a lifelong legacy of pain and suffering.”  The PM committed 5 million Australian dollars ($5 million) to help those affected. There will be help for families to reconnect and support services. A national exhibition will draw on people's experiences, using the nation's archives as a source.

The forced adoption policy offers a warning to those who believe we should stick with the tried and tested family unit rather than thinking outside of the box. Times change.

After the Second World War, until the late 70s, the Australian goverment, and many citizens, believed that a child needed to be raised in a loving relationship or at least by a couple. The parents had to be a man and a woman living as married partners. The idea of a lone parent raising a child was dismissed as not workable

Unmarried mothers faced a tough time. In the early days they were often shunned by family and friends. In the 40s and 50s that was normal in places such as the UK and USA too. In Australia however it went a step further. Unmarried mothers were pressurised to hand over their baby or babies for adoption. They were somtimes threatened and often deceived. The Australian Senate had decided that the babies of unmarried children should be brought up by childless parents. Those who could not have children of their own.

During the last few years there have been a series of apologies in Oz, from such as,
  • Roman Catholic hospitals in Australia, that apologized in 2011
  • In 2010 Western Australia’s Parliament apologized to mothers and children for the practices in that state from the 1940s until the 1980s.
Other states have or are following suit.

Adoption in Australia is handled by government agencies. Before 1973 government agencies would not allow unmarried mothers any benefits which may have helped the family unit stay together.

An estimated 225,000 unwed mothers surrendered their babies for adoption, most forcibly. There was some corruption with signatures allowing adoption forged. Some babies were signed over before they were even born. The girls and women faced a huge amount of pressure and most gave in seeing no viable alternative.

During the 50s, 60s and early 70s, when most of the forced adoptions took place, Australia was a Conservative led Christian country. The victims of this cruel policy have said that a parliamentary apology was long overdue. Japan Times reports,

Christine Cole, the head of the Apology Alliance, who lost a child through forced adoption, told ABC television the words were long overdue.

“I had my baby taken from me in 1969, and I think the use of the term ‘forced adoption’ polarizes the actual phenomena of what was going on,” she said.

“What was going on was kidnapping children, kidnapping newborn babies from their mothers at the birth, using pillows and sheets to cover their face, drugging them as I was drugged, with drugs like sodium pentothal, chloral hydrate and other mind-altering barbiturates,” she said.

“It was cruel, it was punitive and then often the mother was transported like I was away from the hospital so you had no access to your baby.”
Opinion: Monstrous. Get the apologies over and compensate those involved.
 
 
Picture
Fancy a smoke? If the pack of cigarettes you were about to buy was emblazoned with the image shown in this article would you still want one?

Many countries in the West have been trying different angles to dissuade youngsters from becoming smokers whilst hopefully encouraging people who are already hooked to give up. The latest tactic in Australia is packaging cigarettes in unbranded cartons covered with images showing in no uncertain terms what smoking could do for you.

Tobacco companies went to the Australia High Court today, August 15 2012, in an attempt to prevent the changes. These companies claim that their trademarks branding is something of value which will be lost if packs become non branded. The High Court did not agree and rejected the toacoo companies claims.

Only time will tell if covering packs of cigarettes with gruesome images will result in a reduction in smoking. Certainly many of the images are graphic and do not pull any punches. They include imags of cancer-riddled mouths, blinded eyeballs and sickly children. These are all set against an olive green background. Hardly attractive in any way.

The new packs will go on sale in December 2012 and Australian authorities are urging other countries to follow suit. Whether they will remains to be seen. If they do not will we see orrific looking packs of cigarettes on sale in airports alongside bright and glitzy ones?

In the UK packs of cigarettes carry health warnings and images but do not go as far as those propsed for Australia. That country has taken a brave step which will cost the tobacoo companies and their investors dearly. In the end it will come down to money. That will be the overriding actor inh ow each country decides to package cigarettes.

 
 
Picture
January 2011
_Article first published as Australian flooding causes mass evacuation, on Technorati

2011 became famous, or should that be infamous, for two things, protests and extreme weather. From the heavy prolonged snowfalls in the UK early in 2011, to earthquakes such as those in New Zealand and Japan, the Japanese Tsunami and flooding in Australia, severe weather was the order of the day.

If the first month or so of 2012 is anything to go by the weather could be problematic again. Currently fairly heavy snow in the UK is causing chaos but as it is still winter such weather is hardly out of the ordinary. Europe has seen much more prolonged snow and freezing cold temperatures resulting in many deaths and widespread disruption.

Across the World though, in the Antipodes, floodwater has been also causing major disruption. Parts of Australia suffered a great deal of flooding in 2011. The people's pioneer spirit rose to the fore and communities rallied to help each other. Flooding though does have an impact on one of Australia's best industries, that is tourism.

February 5, 2012, Australian people living in Queensland are being advised to evacuate the area, as a matter of urgency. Homes are having to be abandoned in order to protect life. Sadly one death has been recorded so far. A woman has been swept away after she managed to rescue her young son. As yet her body has not been recovered.

Queensland was hard hit by flooding in 2012. The area would have still been recovering from that disaster, when flooding struck again. Now the area and its people are facing yet more of the same, only this time the flooding is expected to be record breaking. The water levels should peak in a couple of days which means there is more of the same to come first.

Search and rescue teams are snatching people to safety when and where they can. Industries such as cotton farming have been badly hit already. Evacuations have been taking place on and off this week but now they have become imperative. Whether flood defenses can hold remains to be seen.