Picture
March 14, 2012 and Barack Obama has officially welcomed UK PM David Cameron to the States. Both may be excellent statesmen or not. It depends upon your viewpoint. Here for what it is worth is this blogger's personal viewpoint.

Both leaders have made speeches today. Both have sycophantly praised each other. At one point I began to wonder what is in a word. After all when President Obama referred to War as theatre he is not alone. However by terming it in such a way does it somehow make it less like murder? Similarly I was left wondering this when I watched the Bradley Manning footage which showed US troops cold bloodedly killing civilians but calling it engaging. 

Choosing words carefully is important. After all say it the right way and would be voters will fall for it hook line and sinker. Tell it as it is and you may be booted out of office.

David Cameron has today stood in front of the media and quite frankly talked BS. He knows it is BS. Obama knows it is BS. Any person with an ounce of common sense knows it is BS. He may wrap it up in fine words and soft soap for the general public but we are not as stupid as he hopes. 

We are sick and tired of increasing UK unemployment, our supposed love affair with the US, our ties to a crumbling Europe, our involvement in conflicts, our huge sums of money spent outside of the UK and, in this blogger's, case our UK Coalition government.

The UK sank one more place on the list of the World's most prominent countries this week. It is time we took a back seat. It is time we addressed our problems at home. It is time the fat cats ceased to prosper on the back of the have nots. It is time for a fairer UK society. It is time to leave conflicts abroad behind not be contemplating involvement in yet more.

An Internet buddy has a good phrase which he uses at times about people. He will say that they have "BS baffled brains" Yes sadly too many people have. Perhaps more worryingly too many that do are in positions of power. 

For heaven's sake as my old Mum used to say "Speak the turth and shame the devil" 

 
 
Picture
March 12, 2012. A new week begins but will it be more of the same in Afghanistan? The aftermath of Koran burnings by US military personnel has hardly settled and now reportedly a lone rogue US soldier has massacred at least 15 civilians. The dead include women and children. All were murdered as they slept in their homes.

Perhaps surprisingly for Westerners it is not known if the Afghan people will react as strongly to yesterday's tragedy as they did to the Koran burnings. The Koran has such a special significance to the Afghan people that it was an attack on the population. That said this weekend's murders could still result in an increase in terrorism. The Taliban have however vowed recriminations.

Many of the media reports that have been coming out of Afghanistan in recent years tell a terrible tale. The US and its propaganda team may try an ongoing damage limitations exercise but it is safe to say that this weekend's murders were not an isolated incident. US soldiers urinating on dead Afghans, Kill teams and more appear to be just the tip of the iceberg.

The US is due to leave Afghanistan in the coming years but it had hoped to leave behind a contingency force. What could prove to be a deal breaker on this though is immunity from prosecution for US troops. Yes the US likes to protect its military, or least it does sometimes. Apparently immunity from prosecution was a deal breaker in Iraq. In the end having fought hard for so long the US simply pulled out every single member of US forces. It may be that rogue US soldiers will face American justice but what will that entail?

For this blogger the case of Bradley Manning comes to mind. This young soldier was obviously a troubled soul. Accused of leaking secrets to Wikileaks he has endured years in jail without trial. He was kept in isolation and there have been accusations levied against his jailers, of torture. Manning showed the world a little oh what was really going on with some of the US military abroad. For some he will always be a traitor and for others a hero. Did his actions jeopardise the lives of others? Maybe. Did he reveal a little of what was really happening in Iraq? Definitely.

The US is often viewed from other countries as a "bunch of hypocrites" I say the US as it is successive US administrations not simply the Obama one.

Whether it turns out that this weekend's killings were by a lone soldier or not justice must be served. Until a full investigation is complete do not rule out any conclusion. It could still be a cover up for one of the US night raids that went wrong. Time will tell if the truth is eventually released.

If it was on lone soldier who had flipped will he still face prosecution? You could say Bradley Manning fitted that category but officials do not care about him. He however did not directly kill anyone.

A lone gunman in for example a school in America would feel the full brunt of the law, no matter what his mental status was. So what is the difference with these Afghan murders?

If you have not seen it before watch the attached video. It shows murder plain and simple called "engaging" the enemy or should that be a group of Afghan men..This blogger thanks Bradley Manning for his bravery in ensuring that such murder did not go unseen. Out of sight and out of mind.

Bradley Manning faced a possible life sentence in jail or even the death penalty. His fate is still not clear.

An interesting related blog can be read here

Final thoughts: The perpetrator of this crime may indeed be suffering from PTSD. He could however have carried out a revenge attack for the Koran burning US deaths. He could have been part of a night attack that went wrong. He could have wanted a way out of Afghanistan. He may have wanted to go out with a bang. He may have looked at previous lenient sentences which have been handed out to US troops, other than people like Bradley Manning, and thought I can do as I like and get away with it. That is what comes of a record of failed justice. Time to come clean, hold your hands up and mete out appropriate justice.

 
 
Picture
Hypocrisy is the name of the game in the UK again although it should be football, at least as far this story goes. Instead of learning from past lessons the England Squad are now without a manager and set to flounder. They are pinning their hopes on a new "english" manager but it will take more than that. It will take a team truly acting and playing as a team.

Behind the scenes it seems that Fabio Capello was in trouble with the FA  for an outspoken interview on Italian TV.  In this interview he criticised the FA and its decision to strip John Terry of the England captaincy. He had, rightly in this blogger's opinion, criticised the fact the we British are quick to demand a free and fair trial, upholding our premise that you are innocent until proven guilty, but do not want to act this way. In other words h felt that Terry should have retained the captaincy until he was proven guilty or innocent of the racism allegations.

It has been reported that this was viewed by the FA as some sort of breach of protocol when Fabio spoke to the Italian media.. Leaving his home late yesterday Mr Capello was tight lipped and it is generally viewed that a gagging order of sorts has been implemented. So much for free speech in the UK too.

The players though have been free to tweet to kingdom come. Some have applauded Fabio for his track record but most have expressed their desire for an "English manager". How many of us can choose our boss? We have to go with the flow and continue to work. That is what these "prima donna's should be doing too.

Maybe here it is worth noting that Fabio, as far as team wins goes, was more successful than many previous modern day England squad managers, including English ones, such as Kevin Keegan.

Pundits seem sure that Harry Redknapp will replace Capello but this may cause a new set of problems.:
  1.  He may now want to take this seemingly poisoned chalice.
  2. Who will captain England with John Terry out of the picture at least for now?
  3. As a man who speaks his mind, often in a casual way with the media, will he suit the "protocol" of the FA?
It is important for English football that the new manager decision is not made in haste and repented at leisure. That said the FA could do to re-think many things regarding the England Squad. If they are not prepared to do that nothing will change. A few months or years down the line the whole fiasco will happen again. We will be name calling a manager for the appalling performance of our team, he will unceremoniously leave and we will then decide he was a hero after all.

 
 
Picture
In the UK we tend to take our National Health Service for granted. At times we all complain about it. When we receive exceptionally good treatment few of us bother to praise the NHS. After all the best should be the norm, right? Well yes but would it hurt to occasionally take a step back, take a long hard look and consider the alternative.

That said people in the UK tend to be protective of the NHS. It is a very British care system, one that may need to be tweaked from time too time, but one that few would want to wave good bye to.

David Cameron made much in his election manifesto about how the NHS was safe in his hands but he has since proved that is far from the truth. The NHS has been under attack on all fronts. Reform looks set to put funding back in GP hands. If you work for the NHS, as this blogger does, you will find that work there long enough and you will see a circle of changes. Almost 13 years down the road the latest changes are reminiscent of a few years ago.

Much is made that over paid administrator posts will be rightly cut but in reality it is front line jobs that are going. Those at the top handle the job cuts and predictably protect themselves.

The NHS is facing too many changes at one time. In order to meet demands and targets it is disappearing in a type of twilight zone. Government fines are levied against some sections, constantly making budget targets impossible to achieve.

February 8, 2012, the NHS reform was discussed in UK Parliament. The House of Lords has again rejected the bill without more amendments. The Tories though look set to continue like a dog with a bone. Labour leader, Ed Miliband, got the upper hand against Cameron the Commons, in spite of the derision and smarm eeking out of the Coalition front bench.

David Cameron's only defence seemed to be a personal attack. He attacked Mr Milband saying that Ed's position in the Labour party was fragile. We all know that attack is the poorest form of defence which this proved. Mr Cameron had little to say that was positive about the NHS reforms, so launch a personal attack on the Labour leader instead. I ask you?

Even an oped in the Financial Times agrees that the reform plans are a mess. As it says, the plans lack the necessary skill. If Cameron chooses to belligerently stay on the same NHS path it could prove to be his political downfall. Could we be so lucky?