Picture
Venice is flooded. No this is not a joke. Yes we know Venice is a city built with canals and waterways as a huge part of its infrastructure but this historic city is also experiencing modern day weather changes.

Each year, around this time, water levels in Venice rise. This can cause flooding. This year the waters have continued to rise making movement around Venice tricky.

Where there are paths and pavements the water is already almost waist deep. The people of Venice are attempting to go about their daily business as uusual but it is becoming  increasingly difficult to do so. Temporary walkways and bridges have been constructed to try and alleviate "transport" issues. Consider though canal side paths that are knee high in water. How on earth will you tell where the path ends and the canal begins?

Venice's seasonal flooding each Autumn is called ‘acqua alta'. Venetians are obviously resourceful people. They would have to be to live in such a city as Venice. The new challenges pose problems though, not least for tourists and the tourist trade. You may long to see Venice and its watery canals but would you want the few streets to be awash also? Probably not.

The "Venetian Lagoon" is prone to flooding each year in Spring and Autumn. Building in such a place was always going to result in some problems. Currently a big swathe of America and most of the Caribbean Islands are still recovering from their extreme weather last weekend. For Venice it may be business as usual but surely in a few more years this individualistic piece of Italy will be unsustainable?

According to the Mail online, "Earlier this year, scientists warned that Venice may soon have to ditch its nickname - The Floating City - as it is sinking into the water more than five times quicker than previously thought.  The city is also tilting to the east and heading out to the Adriatic Sea, as it is hit by more floods than ever before, according to experts. Previous studies had shown water-levels in the former capital of the Maritime Venetian Republic had stabilised.  But research by Scripps Institution Of Oceanography at UC San Diego, and published in March, claimed it has actually submerged, and tilted to the east, by an unprecedented 2mm per year over the last decade."

Travel advice must be to visit Venice when and whilst you can if it is a place you long to visit.

More here

 
 
Picture
Whether you believe that extreme weather is man-made or a natural phenomenon there is no doubting that we have abused this planet for years. Modern life takes its toll on many things not least the environment. Our "conveniences" come at a high price as we decimate rain forests, contaminate areas with radiation following nuclear testing and carelessly dispose of huge amounts of possibly contaminated waste. Some of this will leave a terrible legacy for the future but some will have an effect now. Extreme weather could be a result of this abuse.

2012 will be memorable for many people as one of extreme weather. Floods, torrential rain and drought have been experienced by many people across the globe.

Today there is news of a 7.7 earthquake of the coast of Canada triggering a tsunami which hit Hawaii, thousands of miles away, In the end both the tsunami and the earthquake appear to have had little effect on Canada or Hawaii. The Tsunami waves were relatively small compared to what had been predicted. Early warning systems had given residents in Hawaii the chance to make provisions for their safety. A cautious approach is bound to be better when you consider the dreadful 2004 Boxing Day Tsunami which caused massie damage and loss of life in parts of Southern Asia.

North American is also "battening down the hatches" in preparation for what has been described  " Frankenstorm". In the US this will cause a headache, to say the least, for Presidential hopefuls Barack Obama and Mitt Romney. It could affect voters and the campaign trail of both. It will be tougher for Obama as President as he will have "business as usual" to do whilst Romney can concentrate on his election campaign. Both may in some ways utilise the storm for their own ends  Bible thumpers in the US may utilise the storm for their own ends choosing to see it as a sign from their God. The people experiencing the brunt of this storm will be the losers. They stand to lose incomes, businesses, homes, loved ones and more.

According  to Reuters reporting on the Canadian earthquake, "The U.S. Geological Survey said an earthquake with a 7.7 magnitude had hit the province, centered 123 miles south-southwest of Prince Rupert at a depth of 6.2 miles. Earthquakes Canada said the quake in the Haida Gwaii region has been followed by numerous aftershocks as large as 4.6 and said a small tsunami has been recorded by a deep ocean pressure sensor."

The Canadian earthquake is a reminder of why protesters are still opposing the Oil Pipelines in Canada. There is always the risk that a "natural" phenomenon such as an earthquake will result in a huge environmental disaster especially where oil is involved. Worth the risk? Hardly unless you stand to gain financially and care nothing about the environment.

 
 
Picture
When we think of countries wth terrible carbon emissions we tend to think of China and developing nations. You may be surprised to read that Australia has a terrible track record. In relation to its population head count Australia is the worst carbon emmitter in the world. The current Australian government has acted to limit the country's carbon emissions but this has received a mixed response.

Some claim that the newly implemented carbon tax is a necessary evil but it seems far more Australians believe the tax is flawed and will cost Australian industry dearly. It could also cost Aussie PM Gillard dearly as many see the implementation of this tax as the final nail in her political coffin.

Industries in Australia highlighted as the worst offenders currently, are set to pay a huge carbon tax which is much higher than that paid in Europe. "The law forces about 300 of the worst-polluting firms to pay a A$23 (£15; $24) levy for every tonne of greenhouse gases they produce."

Reuters has reported,

"The scheme allows emissions trading from 2015, when polluters and investors will be able to buy overseas carbon offsets, or ultimately trade with schemes in Europe, New Zealand and possibly those planned in South Korea and China.

Prime Minister Julia Gillard's minority government says the plan is needed to fight climate change and curb greenhouse gas pollution. Australia has amongst the world's highest per capita CO2 emissions due to its reliance on coal-fired power stations.

Yet even as it starts, the scheme's future is in doubt. The conservative opposition has vowed to repeal it if they win power in elections due by late next year and have whipped up a scare campaign saying the tax will cost jobs and hurt the economy.

Gillard, her poll ratings near record lows and her Labor party heading for a heavy election defeat, hopes that the campaign will quickly run out of steam once the scheme starts.

"Cats will still purr, dogs will still bark," Gillard said after Opposition leader Tony Abbott's visit to an animal shelter to warn of higher electricity prices on charities. "The leader of the opposition's fear campaign will collide with the truth.""

The Australian carbon tax has been in the planning some time. It has been resisted by the government's opposition. Gillard claims that people will not hurt financially, as they might, due to protections put in place for those on low incomes. The opposition continue to maintain the new tax will be too costly and result in increased energy bills and more.

Any new taxes are always controversial. In time many are simply taken for granted. The problem with taxes supposedly aimed at helping the environement is do they do so? Western efforts are like a drop of rain in a huge ocean unless all coutries play the same game. The Global environment is not selective. If a country abuses the environment other countries suffer. That is a fact.

Certainly there may be some instances when a polluion problem hits only a single country initially but in the long run most damage our beloved planet. In the end Australians, like the rest of the World's population, will have to decide between money and the environment.

The UK in the fifties had chimneys such as those shown above pumping poison into the air. They have long gone. The ones above are Australian. Environmental change is costly, there is no doubt. Ignoring the damage we do to our environment will be more costly in real terms.

Tags: Australian carbon tax, PM Gillard, Aussie carbon emissions, Chins, global economies, Australia, green issues

 
 
Picture
Weather patterns around the globe have been changing. Whether you believe this is down to environmental damage or just one of those things is up to you. Certainly there appears to be evidence to support both.

This wonderful old earth of ours had been spinning away for what we think of as an extremely long time. In comparison to the Planets it could still be a relatively new World. A baby even. During this time it has, and will continue to, experienced changing weather patterns.

Then again man's desire for change has involved some damaging acts, a few irresponsible ones and many that have been just plain barmy. Nuclear tests, nuclear accidents, the dropping of bombs, savage wars, pollution and more all form part of our legacy.

Even if you do not believe that our behaviour has damaged Mother Earth it stands to reason that it is not beneficial to anyone to pump out poisons, pollutants, bomb to kingdom come and live too close to the edge. It may of course suit those who stand to make money out of such acts.

The UK winter of 2010 / 2011 saw a return to heavy snow which lasted for a prolonged period of time. This type of snowfall had not been experienced for many a year in the UK. The last few Springs have been unusually dry and, with lower rainfall during the winter and summer times, water has become in short supply. We are told that as consecutive years have been this way water stocks have had no chance of recovery.

You do have to wonder on this one though, if the "drought" is partly due to poor management of water stocks in the UK. After all, as soon as a drought is announced each Spring the heavens open and rain falls as if it will never stop. In 2007 this blogger was a victim of heavy flooding during the month of June. What happened to all of this water? The heavy snowfall of the previous winter, 2010? 2011, must also have resulted in some water surely?

2012 weather in the UK though is a little stranger than usual. A fairly rain and snow free winter has been followed by a dry Spring. The milder weather encouraged the "birds and bees" to get started early and UK gardens had been flourishing. The drought problem was exacerbated by a mini heatwave toward the end of March. Record temperatures were recorded across the UK. Places such as Aberdeen in Scotland recorded such high temperatures that locals took to beaches, gardens and parks. It was a welcome taste of the Summer to come.

As the Easter holiday approaches the weather has changed dramatically. A couple of days ago Aberdeen saw 6 inches of snow. Heavy snow moved further south affecting traffic and closing roads. In the North of England many homes lost power supplies and remain this way.

Locally a night of exceptionally strong winds has damaged gardens and tender, young plants. Driving torrential rain has been accompanied by bitterly cold winds today. It is forecast that the rain in some parts will turn to snow. We English often appear to be obsessed with our quirky weather and currently it is certainly a talking point.

Tomorrow April 5, 2012, most UK workers will finish work for a few days Easter holiday. Some will have planned a long weekend away, perhaps camping or in a caravan. Good luck to them is all I can say. Best pack for all weathers as who knows what will happen next.