Picture
After the G8 summit at Camp David USA ended yesterday, May 19, 2012, the world leaders made their way to Chicago to discuss NATO related matters. Ahead of the NATO meeting protesters were out in force. There has since been reports of running battles with police and arrests. As usual the mainstream media has attempted to minimise coverage of the protests.

The protests and those taking part are however almost an integral part of G8 and NATO summits. As such they should be covered. World leaders may not like protesters raising objections to the power they wield but they have a right to be seen and heard. After all the US years ago berated countries such as the Soviet Union for repressing freedom of speech.

Perhaps this is why Russia Today is always quick to cover these news events. 2,500 people attended a rally in Chicago Friday May 19, 2012, and problems have been ongoing since. There are reports of police officers using batons to control events. Today around 1,000 protesters are expected to swell the ranks of those opposing NATO. Of those already arrested three are said to be terror related.

Many of the activists have links to OWS, the occupy wall street movement. They are objecting to a NATO meeting which is focusing on Afghanistan, when the USA has more than enough of its own worries. High unemployment has hit the US hard. Most protesters want the US troops withdrawn from Afghanistan sooner rather than later.

Both sides tell their story slanted to their own ends. However the footage shows that US authorities are trying to curb freedoms in the US. Ironic as they continue to preach the reverse for other countries such as those in the Middle East.

Updates to follow

 
 
Picture
Whilst many in the West continue to applaud the efforts of protesters in the Middle east and Russia it seems that we have little stomach for protest in our own backyard. We are full of hypocrisy for sure, these days. We bemoan unfair elections in Russia and the ME but if media reports are correct both the US and the UK system leave a lot to be desired.

The last general election in the UK resulted in a coalition government with no clear majority of the people wanting then to represent the country. There were reports that polls closed whilst many UK voters had still not been able to cast their vote. In the US many claim that President Obama was not truly elected to office amidst reports of voter fraud. A bit late now, although if it is designed to scupper his 2012 bid for re-election it could hit home. Not that the Republican Party are any better. What happened in the Iowa 2012 GOP vote?  What about allegations of fraud in 2004 when George Bush was re-elected?

It seems to this blogger that western voting is shot to pieces. Yet we continue to offer advice and recommend that those countries in the Middle East follow our lead. As they are tribal countries our form of democracy and election is ill suited to their needs.

Back to the Occupy Protest Movement though.

In Washington DC yesterday, February 4, 2012, the Occupy camp was dismantled. Police moved in, four arrests followed and property such as tents were seized. In the UK the authorities have used similar action lately. With the Queen's Diamond Jubilee in the UK, plus the 2012 Olympics, they will want Occupy out of sight and out of mind. If you believe the mainstream press the whole movement is finished but is it?

Washington could have had the jitters about Occupy DC for many reasons. An infiltrator could attack the President and of course on the world stage protests slap bang outside of the White House do not look good, do they? Especially when the President is berating other countries for their human rights.

It could be that as better weather comes around again a new reformed movement takes to the streets. You may not agree with Occupy wholeheartedly but many run of the mill citizens, such as I, hear what they are saying. They are voicing concerns which so many of us have about politics, corporate greed, the present and the future. They have shown a certain amount of stamina and determination and hopefully it will not have al been in vain.

 
 
Picture
Watching breakfast TV debates on a Sunday can become engrossing, This week a debate on the BBC, which partly debated Occupy London, was one such program. The debating panel was roughly split into two sides. Representatives and members of Occupy London were included. One was instantly struck by the intelligence of those who appeared. Perhaps these Occupy protesters were hand picked for today's program. If not the impression that the majority were middle class was hard to escape. Those on the opposite side of the debate made much of this. They kept referring to the "middle class shanty town" which developed on the steps of St Paul's Cathedral London.

Both sides did, at times, appear to agree with the sentiment behind the Occupy Protest Movement. It seems that more people are against the "fat cats" and "corporate greed" than you may at first think. Today's subject was really about whether a protest group has a right to set up camp. As the protesters said so much of London is now owned by the London Corporation that there is very little space for them to protest legally. Whilst one can understand the argument that the  protesters camp prevents some people going to work or simply enjoying St Paul's, Occupy London is gradually getting its voice heard.

Authorities around the world are aiming to move Occupy protesters on so that they will be out of sight and out of mind. It is up to the protesters to make sure that they remain vocal no matter what happens to their camps.That is if they hold firm beliefs.

Former Labour spin doctor Alistair Campbell agreed with some of what was said but challenged the protesters view that they received little media coverage and in other ways were getting a rough ride. It was easy to see what he was getting at. Protesters in the past have always been between a rock and a hard place. What has ultimately won through has been determination and grit. The will to continue in spite of what the opposition may throw at you.

Occupy in the UK is becoming a voice that people hear. The debates assertion that they should gather together to form a political  party able to stand for election was both right and wrong it seemed. Would Occupy want to join the establishment and be one of those they are berating? Could they raise the funds necessary to be able to do so? There are more questions than answers raised on this point.

People have written about how Occupy is squandering the growth of their movement by appearing to be ramshackle and without a clear mandate or set of aims. Perhaps though that is what they want to be. A force that can change to suit the times. One that remains adamant in its strength of feeling against that elusive 1%. One that makes other people seriously think about what is really going on and the future. If it does it is no bad thing.

Read the Occupied Times for the movement's free updates