Picture
Protesters
The results of the lengthy, and no doubt costly, Leveson inquiry into press standards in the UK have been revealed today, November 29, 2012. PM Cameron and his depuity Nick Clegg had more than a sneak preview and were able to mull over the document late yesterday and early today. The news is that they could not agree on how to go forwards.

At  1.30pm GMT today the Leveson report was made public. It appears that his verdict is that rules and regulations must be tightened up. Leveson has called for the current Press Complaints Commission to be scrapped. In its place he would like to see a new Independent body established and overseen by Ofcom.

Ofcom is reportedly an "Independent regulator and competition authority for the UK communications industries". it seems to make sense then that they are involved and would surely offer a compromise. It is important that we retain as free a press as possible but that individuals are protected.

The Leveson inquiry heard evidence from many who had suffered at the hands of a poorly regulated press. One was the Mother of murdered schoolgirl Millie Dowler. The mother was given false hope that her daughter was alive following some in the media accessing her cell phone.The wrongdoing by certain members of the press ranged from intruding on the privacy of celebrities to paying police for information. There are many heads that need to roll.

David Cameron is all for maintaining the freedom of the press whilst his deputy Nick Clegg wants more regulation. There is talk of incentives to persuade those in the reporting business to voluntarily accept any changes.  Yesterday the Spectator bosses  said that they would not abide by any attempts to limit the freedom of the press.

The new body if it comes into force will have the power to levy £1ml fines against those found to have overstepped the mark.

Such is the disagreement between Cameron and Clegg that they will both deliver individual responses to the report in the House today. So will Labour leader Ed Miliband. The hope is now that the problems will be resolved and a working compromise agreed.

The Hacked Off campaign group, in an initial statement,said,  "These proposals are reasonable and proportionate and we call on all parties to get together to implement them as soon as possible. The press must be given a deadline, the inquiry is over, now is the time for action"

Opinion
You could not watch people like the parents of missing Maddie McCann and Millie Dowler and not be affected. We need to be careful about a knee jerk response though even after all this time. Some bad apples must not be allowed to spoil the whole barrel.

The Press is not as easy to define as it once was. There are online publications, both small like TEK and established such as The Times, there are social media sites such as Twitter and Facebook and then there are websites where people are paid to be citizen journalists. Some are run in the UK but most are not. How on earth can all of this be "policed"

The UK Tories benefitted from a close rleationship with sections of the British media, some would say. That is probably true of all political parties at some time or another. That could be part of the reason why Cameron is reluctant to change things a great deal. The current system could be useful to some.

Source:
SkyNews

 
 
Picture
The UK Leveson inquiry into corruption and sleaze is turning into a rollercoaster affair. It is bound to see at least one political casualty and right now that person seems likely to be Culture Secretary Jeremy Hunt. Just how many more Government Ministers can survive is difficult to assess. In most people's eyes the likes of Theresa May should have already been given the chop.

Yesterday the son, James Murdoch testified at the inquiry and today it is the turn of father, Rupert Murdoch. What is it they say? Hell hath no fury like a Murdoch scorned? 

Peter Cruddas was one Tory Minister sent packing after a recent undercover sting by the Times newspaper. The Times of course is part of the Murdoch empire. Enough said?

Today, at the inquiry, Mr Murdoch senior has revealed that fomer Labour leader and Prime Minster Gordon Brown declared war on the Murdoch Empiree. Mr Murdoch claimed that he was called by the then PM who said,  "Well, your company has declared war on my government and we have no alternative but to make war on your company." Reportedly this followed the Murdoch's decision to support the Conservative election campaign.Suffice to say Mr Brown lost the election.

Much of today's statements have centred on the fact that the Murdoch's were so often at influential parties where would be PMs and current PMs were also attending. Rupert Murdoch went on though to maintain he was never asker for favours and neither did he offer any. It would appear that all of these people just happened to all move in the same social or political circles, that is if you beleive the testimony.

So will Jeremy Hunt survive the allegations that he was less than impartial in the case of the BSkyB bid?

Well today he has continued to maintain that he "strictly followed due process"  He denied the existence of any "back channel" of influence. It is worth mentioning though that Hunt's advisor Adam Smith has resigned. He gave his reason as  "contact with the firm that he said "went too far"". That contact of course was with the News Corp group and its bosses.

Today Hunt addressed a rather raucous House of Commons as the opposition called for his resignation. He stands accused of backing a bid rather than assessing it. Mr Smith has taken the rap as they say. He has insisted that although emails from News Corp had the initials JH in them, his boss, Mr Hunt, had no knowledge of them. Smith said that the, "content and extent of my contact [with News Corporation] was done without authorisation from the Secretary of State". 
Hunt took over the role of managing the BSkyB bid when Lib Dem Vince Cable was caught saying that he had  "declared war on Mr Murdoch".  Was this because Cable was deemed to be acting unfairly or because other members of the government wanted the Murdochs to prevail?

Mr Hunt continues to claim that he will present evidence which will exonerate himself whilst Labour are continuing to demand his resignation or dismissal.

Related reading here 

Tags: Leveson inquiry, UK politics, Rupert Murdoch, James Murdoch, Adam Smith, Jeremy Hunt, resignation calls, News Corp

 
 
Picture
This weekend in the UK the Tory Party were attacked with allegations of sleaze. Tory co-treasurer Peter Cruddas was caught on camera apparently offering access to the PM for a price. In the end Cruddas claimed it was all bravado and David Cameron insisted that no donors have had  special access to the No 10 Cameron's dinner parties.The problem for Mr Cruddas was that the supposed perspective donors were in fact undercover reporters from the Sunday Times. All the apologies and excuses in the world cannot settle nagging doubts that "cash for policy making" in the UK has not been happening.

Yesterday Cameron was insistent that he would not be detailing publicly donors who had been wined and dined in the Cameron's private No 10 apartment. Today he has had a change of heart. Presumably the strength of public feeling encouraged him to come clean. The cynics amongst us may wonder just how we know he has finally told "the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth?"

The knee jerk reaction has also been to announce that from now on:
  •  Details of all meals between Conservative donors and Ministers will be published quarterly
  • Cameron has promised a thorough inquiry into donations.
The PM has however insisted that in the past there have only been four occasions when he has invited Tory donors to No.10. Of these party donors Cameron claims most he had known for years.

The dinners were kept secret until this weekend's events. In the past Cameron has been at pains to insist that any dinner party guests at these occasions were not open for public view. That these events were part of his private life. Hmm. More truth bending it seems.

One person seemingly over the moon with the Tory Party woes is media mogul Rupert Murdoch. Having been accused of much that is corrupt this year it appears that he is beginning to get revenge at last. Was this the purpose of those undercover investigators all along?

Murdoch tweeted happily,  "@rupertmurdoch: Of course there must be a full independent inquiry on both sides. In great detail, and with consequences. Trust must be established." Yes it must but the irony of that tweet is not wasted on us.

Voicing what many in the UK have asked this weekend the Sun's editorial read, "Millions will wonder if Osborne scrapped the 50p rate after a few cozy lunches with millionaire backers." Ouch. They will indeed.

In the last year the Leveson Inquiry set up by David Cameron has been putting the likes of Rupert Murdoch through their paces. The government has had to make once secret backdoor, meetings with Mr Murdoch and other senior media folk. public.

Did the media mogul Murdoch engineer this weekend's events? Can Dodgy Dave survive? Probably on both counts but no doubt time will tell.