Picture
Are you a UK resident? Do you want news that could either make you howl with laughter, cry in pain or spit feathers? Well hold on to your hat here it comes.

The UK government has offered £10bn ($15bn) in loans to the International Monetary Fund (IMF)
to help economies in trouble. WHAT! I hear you scream.

IMF, international monetary fund, managing director Christine Legarde is hoping to swell the coffers considerably. She wants an increase of $400bil. Of course other countries are being asked to contribute. Right now the details of countries and their additional contributions are, Australia will contribute $7bn, Singapore $4bn and the Republic of Korea $15bn.

Details of this farce can be read at the BBC here. For what it is worth here is this blogger's opinion.

UK citizens are experiencing job cuts, pay freezes, high taxes, inflation hikes, welfare cuts, increased retirement ages, cuts to the military, emergency services cuts, NHS reform, and more. That we are told is the tough medicine we need to swallow to survive. We may not all agree but we will probably all begrudgingly accept this at least for now. The next election will see most people expressing their view then by way of the ballot box.

We do not however want to be told to tighten our belts for the government to squander money to a worthless cause. Let The EU is finished. Pouring good money after bad is not a sensible option. If you have a house that is beyond repair you tear it down and start again. That is unless you have money to waste and are happy spending on a "money pit".

Governments may feel that  they have no other option but that is short sighted. It the EU is going to fail they are simply delaying the inevitable and making a mess of economies in the process.Countries such as Greece that have been trown into deep debt will not survive without radical change. For them it will be an exit from the EU. It has to be. Those countries just protecting their own ends are not being helpful. They are adding to the impending disaster.

Asking UK people to work longer for less money and fewer entitlements may seem all well and good to our illustrious Coalition government but the people may not agree. After all telling us we will have to "suck it and see" when the people of countries we will be bailing out retire earlier and enjoy higher benefits and lower taxes is a nonsense. If Chancellor Osborne has money to squander perhaps he could reverse the granny tax, stop NHS waiting lists increasing, put more police on the streets, improve the minimum wage or commit to 100 and more other improvements sorely needed in Great Britain. Money to burn? Yes it seems when it suits there sure is.

Tags: Granny Tax, Chancellor Osborne, UK taxes, IMF, UK IMF loans, Christine Legarde, bank bail outs

 
 
Picture
Some ideas are good full stop whilst others may be at certain times. The lastest proposal from UK Chancellor George Osborne may sound a good idea on paper but what of the cost?

The Chancellor has announced that in 2014 each UK citizen will receive a detailed breakdown of how the Government has spent, or plans to spend, the Tax it has collected. Some have seen this move as early electioneering. Come 2014 it is likely that the UK will have a General Election. That is unless somewhere between now and then this fragile Coalition government falters.

In 2014 a breakdown showing just what is being spent on welfare, and the like, could prove an effective election tool. Again however this blogger wonders what will it cost?

According to the BBC, "The statement will set out how much people pay in direct taxes such as national insurance and income tax, outlining proportions used for education, health and welfare" However, "The statement will not take account of indirect taxes such as VAT and fuel duty, although ministers are planning an online calculator to show people how much of these taxes they are paying too".

Those proposing this annual tax breakdown say it will give greater transparency. They also maintain that people have a right to know where their taxes are spent. Whilst both statements are true, again we must ask what will be the cost? It will not come cheap. Such new systems never do. Will it offer value for money and a vital service during such austere times? You tell me.