Sexual harassment is indeed a reality, and as such it has many political, moral, and intensely spiritual ramifications.
Sexual harassment is a two-way street.
Limiting the discussion of sexual harassment to merely the unwanted advances into one of the erogenous zones by one human, (often a man,) forced on another human, (often a woman,) could present itself as being self-serving to women as a gender, unless the sheer numbers of female-reported incidents is balanced over against the potentially larger numbers of unreported female as well as male incidents.
(Congratulations to the young men in Pennsylvania, who had the courage to report their actual sexual violations. One wonders how many more incidents of sexual harassment go unreported, due to high levels of embarrassment and shame.)
However, are human beings only sexual with regard to the physical body?
Much research of the past two to three decades has focused on the maleness and the femaleness of the mind and of the emotions, too.
The initial findings of studies of the ways in which the XX and XY chromosomes apply direct influence on the construction of the Corpus Callosum connections, between the two hemispheres of the brain, seem to indicate that the male brain operates these connections as "one-way streets," limiting the scope as well as the speed in which information can be processed.
Therefore, facts indicate that gray matter is more abundant in the male brain, while at the same time white matter is more abundant in the female brain.
This means that the female brain has more of these corpus callosum connections, and these connections seem to operate as eight-lane highways with four lanes in each direction, maximizing the scope and speed with which information can be processed.
This scientific data has been labeled, "inconclusive."
However, sociologists, also, observe humans, and their findings seem to agree with science. How so?
Little girls often talk to multiple friends at once, while brushing their dolls' hair, walking around the playground, inspecting the safety-features of all the equipment, numbering and collecting the pieces of trash, (aka green violations,) for the purpose of reporting back to the teacher after recess.
If this makes them happy, then more power to them,...as long as they are communicating female-to-female.
However, that which is considered socially-acceptable, when interacting female-to-female, becomes sexual harassment, when females interact with males.
(When a woman comes up to me, and begins to speak to me the same way that she would speak to another woman, I am highly offended. I don't know what in the Earth-Core Magma she is talking about.
Frankly, if the women of my personal acquaintance represent women in general, then it appears that the default status of female-speak was learned at the hands of the early-childhood educational company, Hooked-On Pronouns.
One does not say one word, meaning 50 words at the same time, unless one is speaking with another female.
Are we Communicating?)
It seems that little boys are often transfixed, doing one thing at a time, while grunting and/or saying one or two words, occasionally, in quasi-conversation, until the job is fully completed.
Demand boys to come in for supper, before the game or project is finished, and you are likely to have sullen or angry participants of the meal, who could be "questioning your parentage," under the breath.
Such a demand is arguably sexual harassment, since it doesn't take into consideration the differences between the male and the female minds.
The marriage of female and male goals could be stated thusly, "Boys, we are going to have supper in a half hour. Finish your game, or find a stopping point on your project. Be there, when we eat, or go to bed hungry. I am NOT going to call you again. I am NOT going to lose my mind, cajoling you into this house. I am NOT going to serve you supper, after the food is put away."
The point is that Momma has just honored her boys in the way that she communicated with them. Momma was clear in stating her terms. Momma "drew a line in the sand." Momma spoke, without being emotional.
(There is nothing, like overactive, loud emotions to cram "peanut butter" into male ears.)
Momma spoke directly to the male brain, through the use of chain-of-command. Those boys have enough meat on their bones that they won't starve, when they miss one meal.
DO NOT GIVE IN! (They will be at the breakfast table "with bells on.")
For a Momma to get all tenderhearted with boys, who disobey, is tantamount to letting sharks smell one drop of blood.
THAT is sexual harassment, which results in no authority over boys in the future.
Frankly, men don't like being treated like a conversational plaything any more than women like being treated like a sexual plaything.
Boys, who are reared to be women, have been sexually harassed, if not sexually-abused and/or sexually-molested. (These facts have personal experience as research data.)
Boys may be reared predominantly by their mothers, until puberty.
At puberty, Momma needs to throw the boy at the Dad, then turn around and run the other way. That is the only way that a feminist can maintain her principles, while avoiding the stigma of sexually harassing her son.
As feminists begin to defend the rights of boys and men, with the same principles and with the same fervency that they have used to defend girls and women, the incidence of sexual harassment, (as it is traditionally defined,) will decrease almost overnight, and the presence of real men will increase almost overnight.
"Where did all the men go?" Sorry, Ladies, but extremist-feminists have sexually harassed them into oblivion.
Jail those extremists, then sexual harassment will fade into oblivion, and a more genial world will return to view.
Sexual harassment is a two-way street.
Limiting the discussion of sexual harassment to merely the unwanted advances into one of the erogenous zones by one human, (often a man,) forced on another human, (often a woman,) could present itself as being self-serving to women as a gender, unless the sheer numbers of female-reported incidents is balanced over against the potentially larger numbers of unreported female as well as male incidents.
(Congratulations to the young men in Pennsylvania, who had the courage to report their actual sexual violations. One wonders how many more incidents of sexual harassment go unreported, due to high levels of embarrassment and shame.)
However, are human beings only sexual with regard to the physical body?
Much research of the past two to three decades has focused on the maleness and the femaleness of the mind and of the emotions, too.
The initial findings of studies of the ways in which the XX and XY chromosomes apply direct influence on the construction of the Corpus Callosum connections, between the two hemispheres of the brain, seem to indicate that the male brain operates these connections as "one-way streets," limiting the scope as well as the speed in which information can be processed.
Therefore, facts indicate that gray matter is more abundant in the male brain, while at the same time white matter is more abundant in the female brain.
This means that the female brain has more of these corpus callosum connections, and these connections seem to operate as eight-lane highways with four lanes in each direction, maximizing the scope and speed with which information can be processed.
This scientific data has been labeled, "inconclusive."
However, sociologists, also, observe humans, and their findings seem to agree with science. How so?
Little girls often talk to multiple friends at once, while brushing their dolls' hair, walking around the playground, inspecting the safety-features of all the equipment, numbering and collecting the pieces of trash, (aka green violations,) for the purpose of reporting back to the teacher after recess.
If this makes them happy, then more power to them,...as long as they are communicating female-to-female.
However, that which is considered socially-acceptable, when interacting female-to-female, becomes sexual harassment, when females interact with males.
(When a woman comes up to me, and begins to speak to me the same way that she would speak to another woman, I am highly offended. I don't know what in the Earth-Core Magma she is talking about.
Frankly, if the women of my personal acquaintance represent women in general, then it appears that the default status of female-speak was learned at the hands of the early-childhood educational company, Hooked-On Pronouns.
One does not say one word, meaning 50 words at the same time, unless one is speaking with another female.
Are we Communicating?)
It seems that little boys are often transfixed, doing one thing at a time, while grunting and/or saying one or two words, occasionally, in quasi-conversation, until the job is fully completed.
Demand boys to come in for supper, before the game or project is finished, and you are likely to have sullen or angry participants of the meal, who could be "questioning your parentage," under the breath.
Such a demand is arguably sexual harassment, since it doesn't take into consideration the differences between the male and the female minds.
The marriage of female and male goals could be stated thusly, "Boys, we are going to have supper in a half hour. Finish your game, or find a stopping point on your project. Be there, when we eat, or go to bed hungry. I am NOT going to call you again. I am NOT going to lose my mind, cajoling you into this house. I am NOT going to serve you supper, after the food is put away."
The point is that Momma has just honored her boys in the way that she communicated with them. Momma was clear in stating her terms. Momma "drew a line in the sand." Momma spoke, without being emotional.
(There is nothing, like overactive, loud emotions to cram "peanut butter" into male ears.)
Momma spoke directly to the male brain, through the use of chain-of-command. Those boys have enough meat on their bones that they won't starve, when they miss one meal.
DO NOT GIVE IN! (They will be at the breakfast table "with bells on.")
For a Momma to get all tenderhearted with boys, who disobey, is tantamount to letting sharks smell one drop of blood.
THAT is sexual harassment, which results in no authority over boys in the future.
Frankly, men don't like being treated like a conversational plaything any more than women like being treated like a sexual plaything.
Boys, who are reared to be women, have been sexually harassed, if not sexually-abused and/or sexually-molested. (These facts have personal experience as research data.)
Boys may be reared predominantly by their mothers, until puberty.
At puberty, Momma needs to throw the boy at the Dad, then turn around and run the other way. That is the only way that a feminist can maintain her principles, while avoiding the stigma of sexually harassing her son.
As feminists begin to defend the rights of boys and men, with the same principles and with the same fervency that they have used to defend girls and women, the incidence of sexual harassment, (as it is traditionally defined,) will decrease almost overnight, and the presence of real men will increase almost overnight.
"Where did all the men go?" Sorry, Ladies, but extremist-feminists have sexually harassed them into oblivion.
Jail those extremists, then sexual harassment will fade into oblivion, and a more genial world will return to view.
RSS Feed
