Picture
By Peter B. Meyer – 16th of September 2012
 
Quote: “The gold standard has one tremendous virtue: the quantity of the money supply, under the gold standard, is independent of the policies of governments and political parties. This is its advantage. It is a form of protection against spendthrift governments.” - Ludwig von Mises.
 
Contrary to Mises wise statement; a new round of quantitative easing QE3, without a defined limit, because it will continue until the outlook for the labor market gets better, says Ben Bernanke. However Bernanke, and Draghi too, should know that money printing doesn’t create jobs at all!
 
As a few days earlier ECB’s Mario Draghi said, he is going to print more money as well, to save the EU and the Euro. But his crisis was already developing almost from the EU’s conception, and now creating events reaching potentially catastrophic levels; most people have no idea how dangerous this situation is going to be. The real doomsday may lie in the destruction of the euro and the breakup of the EU. Should the euro collapse, the effects would be long lasting and devastating, for the entire global economy.  
 
Recapitulating: the ECB prints unlimited quantities to support EU sovereign bond markets. The FED prints $40 billion monthly for bond purchases for an unlimited period of time, and keep interest rates near zero until 2015. This really is shamelessly inflationary!  
 
The fact is, no matter where you keep your dollars and euros; they now are being devalued by the second. 
The central bankers’ "print and promise" actions in trying desperately to keep the U.S. and EU economies afloat are flushing your savings down the drain. What is to happen next?
 
o Real purchasing powers of wages are falling.  
o Government deficits are growing.  
o Interest rates are rising – depending manipulation by both the ECB and the FED.
 
As Marc Faber explains below: "the asset values of his holdings will go up," but as a responsible citizen he is worried because "the monetary policies of the U.S. (and the EU) will destroy the world." It is class warfare under a veil of "it's good for you," as he notes: "the fallacy of monetary policy in the U.S. -and the EU- is to believe this money will go to the man on the street. It won't. It goes to the well to do."
 
The end surely is near because; “China and Russia ruthlessly are cutting the legs out from under the US Dollar: The end Is coming: The party is almost over”.
 
The U.S. dollar is the world’s reserve currency.  Even with its reduced status in recent years U.S. dollars still make up about 60% of all foreign currency reserves and is held by all countries over the world. Most international trade, like oil and minerals, is conducted in U.S. dollars, and this gives the United States a tremendous economic advantage.  That’s why there is a constant demand for more dollars all over the globe from countries that need them for trading purposes.

Until now the FED was able to flood the financial reserve system with dollars without causing a great amount of inflation because the rest of the world soaked up most of those dollars. But that is changing: China and Russia are shifting away from the U.S. dollar in international trade. When that tipping point is reached, the global demand for U.S. dollars absolutely will diminish, causing a terrifying inflation to the US and the rest of the world. If this scenario sounds far away, then you have missed recent developments. In fact, China and Russia - not the “cronies” of the US have started working long ago, to move the USA to such a situation. The truth is that they are both ruthless competitors of the United States and their leaders already have been calling for a new global currency for many years.  

China and Russia don’t accept that the USA has misused its advantage of having the reserve currency of the world, and over the past several years they have been busy making international trade agreements to avoid payment in US Dollars. Even during Merkel’s recent visit, China and Germany agreed to start conducting an increasing amount of trade based on their own currencies. Such international agreements are nails in the reserve dollar’s coffin. With the next consequences:
· Oil is going to be more expensive in dollars.

· Generally everything is going to cost a lot more.
· Less foreign demand for U.S. government debt.
· Interest rates on U.S. treasuries will rise.
· Interest rates on everything in the economy are going to rise.
No doubt, China and Russia are continuing to undermine the dollar; how are you prepared for the coming fiat currency crisis that your hard work eventually will reduce to cero? Think about your protection:
§ Gold and silver as an inflation hedge.
§ Gold and silver as a currency hedge.
 
Marc Faber: “My worry about gold, and I hold a lot of gold, is the governments will one day take it away.  Because you look at the clowns that are at the Democratic convention, and at the Republican convention, I mean these people don’t own a single ounce of gold.
 
“Mr. Bernanke doesn’t own a single ounce of gold, and Mr. Paul Ryan doesn’t own a single ounce of gold.  So what will they do one day?  They take it away from a minority that owns it. That is the threat that gold owners should be aware of.
 
“If the price really starts to go ballistic, they’ll take it away.  So the best as a gold owner that you can hope for is that it goes up, but not too much.  Just a regularly 5% to 10% per annum, but no more.  If it really goes up ballistically one day, I tell you then that the biggest threat will be that the governments will take it away.
 
“And you can’t hide (your gold) because the US government will knock on the door of the stupid Europeans, the bureaucrats in Brussels, that completely messed up the eurozone, and these bureaucrats in Brussels, they also don’t own any gold.  So they’ll be happy to take it away from the minority that owns it.
 
“Then they’ll knock on the door of the Swiss. The Swiss, they have no backbone. They open the books to any politician in the US and say, ‘Please take it.’  And so they’ll take the gold away as well.  Then the Americans will come to Asia.  That’s where I think the Asians will not open the books.  But who knows?”
 
Be prepared as gold owner what eventually must be done, storage of your gold in Hong Kong or Singapore is safer, otherwise go into silver or even platinum at the right time to maximize your gold profit. Because it is very unlikely that silver or platinum will be confiscated due to their widely industrial use. 
 
Watch Marc Faber’s interview here:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/09/14/marc-faber-stimulus-federal-reserve-destroy-world_n_1884709.html


 
 
Picture
Latest Cartoon by Leon Kuhn: Government of the bankers
By Peter B. Meyer -13th of July 2012

 The ability of modern representative government is that it cheats the masses into believing that they are insiders too. They are encouraged to vote and to believe that their vote really matters. Obviously, it matters not at all. Generally, voters have no idea what or whom they are voting for. Often, they get the opposite of what they thought they had voted for anyway. “Government is a phenomenon, not a system.” It is best understood as a fight between the outsiders and the insiders. The insiders always control the government, and use it to take control of the outsiders. Why do they want to do so? The usual reasons are Wealth, Power, and Status.” In short: Government is an institution wherein the “insiders” take the wealth, power and status from the “outsiders.” 

Thomas Jefferson the elected third president of the USA (1801–1809) said in 1802: "My reading of history convinces me that most bad government results from too much government." - "The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who would not."

Further: "I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and institutions that will grow up around the banks will deprive the people of all property - until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered."

A democracy is nothing more than mob rule, where 51% of the people may take away the rights of the other 49%. The experience of all former ages had shown that of all human governments, democracy was the most unstable, fluctuating and short-lived. Said John Quincy the sixth President of the United States (1825-1829). Yet the protection of the minority, most importantly the individual, along with his private property, is the basis on which the system of government is built. 

Government may provide a useful, even necessary, function — such as keeping the peace and maintaining justice. They sometimes redistribute wealth among the outsiders. They sometimes claim to be acting in the name of the greater good, and often do not. But they always take wealth, power and status from those who are not among the insiders. The Romans already provided proof of this statement whereas power, prestige and wealth flowed back to Rome. 

By giving taxpayers a voice in government, the Dutch and British democracies provided creditors with safer claims for repayment than did kings and princes whose debts died with them. But the recent debt protests from Iceland to Greece and Spain suggest that creditors are shifting their support away from democracies. They are demanding fiscal austerity and even privatization sell-offs.
 
The ECB and EU bureaucracy are now imposing a creditor-oriented austerity on Europe. Ostensibly social democratic governments have been directed to save the banks rather than reviving economic growth and employment. Losses on bad bank loans and speculations are taken onto the public balance sheet while scaling back public spending and even selling off infrastructure. The response of taxpayers stuck with the resulting debt has been to mount popular protests starting in Iceland and Latvia in January 2009, and more widespread demonstrations in Greece and Spain to protest their governments’ refusal to hold referendums on these fateful bailouts of foreign bondholders.
 
The financial sector has gained sufficient influence to use such emergencies as an opportunity to convince governments that the economy will collapse if they do not “save the banks.” In practice this means consolidating their control over policy, which they use in ways that further polarize economies. 

The basic model is giving priority to bankers and leaving economic planning to be dictated by the EU, ECB and IMF, after previously the nation-states was stripped of the power to coin or print money and levy taxes.

The resulting conflict is pitting financial interests against national self-determination. The idea of an independent central bank being “the hallmark of democracy” is a euphemism for relinquishing the most important policy decision – the ability to create money and credit – to the financial sector. Rather than leaving the policy choice to popular referendums, the rescue of banks organized by the EU and ECB now represents the largest category of rising national debt. 

The private bank debts taken onto government balance sheets in Ireland, Greece, and now in Spain have been turned into taxpayer obligations. The same is true for America’s $13 trillion added since September 2008 including $5.3 trillion in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac bad mortgages taken onto the government’s balance sheet, and $2 trillion of Federal Reserve “cash-for-trash” swaps.

Barclays’ bank insiders setting Libor interest rates to suit themselves, rather than be determined by sellers and buyers, is the ultimate scandal. But this is more or less what one had expected in a world of manipulated interest rates, where those rates are set lower for banker’s own benefit. As a show of honesty both the Chairman and its chief executive have been ousted with “golden handshakes”.  But isn’t manipulating interest rates lower exactly what all-central bankers the world over do? They think they have the right. They say it will help to stimulate growth.

Financial proxies euphemized as technocrats are dictating this. Designated by creditor lobbyists, their role is to calculate just how much unemployment and depression is needed to squeeze out a surplus to pay creditors for debts now on the books. What makes this calculation self-defeating is the fact that economic shrinkage – debt deflation – makes the debt burden even less payable.
 
The result has been junk economics. Its aim is to disable public checks and balances, shifting planning power into the hands of high finance on the claim that this is more efficient than public regulation. 

Government planning and taxation is accused of being “the road to serfdom,” as if “free markets” controlled by bankers give leeway to act recklessly if not planned by special interests in advance, in ways that are oligarchic, and not democratic. Governments are told to pay bailout debts taken on not to defend countries in military warfare as in times past, but to benefit the wealthiest layer of the population by shifting its losses onto taxpayers.
 
The failure to take the wishes of voters into consideration leaves the resulting national debts on shaky ground politically and even legally. Governments may act democratically to subordinate the banking and financial sector to serve the economy, not the other way around. 

Despite all the phony governments’ interventions the recovery is not coming, it remains the same deplorable situation as the last two years. Recovery is impossible this isn’t an ordinary recession. The world faces a huge solvency problem and not a liquidity problem. New money supply cannot restore health to sick loans and government bonds. The only way to restore solvency to the financial system is to deflate the economy or slash the amount of debt through mass bankruptcy.
Nevertheless the elite will continue to defend their turf by printing more money until the bitter end, count with a long road down and a lot more unnecessary suffering. 

Note: “There is no means of avoiding the final collapse of a boom brought about by credit expansion. The alternative is only whether the crisis should come sooner, as the result of a voluntary abandonment of further credit expansion, or later, as a final and total catastrophe of the currency system involved.” Those are the words of Austrian economist Ludwig Von Mises.

 
 
Picture
By Peter B. Meyer – 11th of March 2012

When people rob banks, they go to jail. 
When bankers rob people they get a bonus. "The [latest Greek] deal sets the euro zone up for a political row involving Triple-A countries. Originally, the Greek debt was for 36% held by taxpayer-backed institutions [ECB, IMF, EFSF]. But by 2015, following the voluntary restructuring and this second bailout, the share could increase to as much as 85%, meaning that Greece’s debt will be overwhelmingly owned by EU taxpayers – putting them at risk of large losses under a future default.” This deal may have sown the seeds of a major political and economic crisis at the heart of Europe, which in the medium and long term further threatens the stability of the EU.


“Greece isn’t about saving Greece.” “The only reason something so small and insignificant could matter so much is that it matters in a way no one is willing to say.” Writes Dan Denning, and continues: “It’s about the subversion of sovereignty and democratic processes by removing decisions from people and giving them to trans-national financial elites. It’s about preserving a global system that’s based on the accumulation of debt and growing government power because there are two groups of people who benefit tremendously from that system, even if most people don’t.”

It isn’t the rescue package about debt reduction. It isn’t about maintaining the integrity of the euro currency and even the viability of the euro zone itself. Not only is the euro better off without Greece, Greece is surely better off without the euro too. It’s a mutually abusive, hatred liaison.

“With its own currency, Greece could default, devalue, inflate and start over.” Like Argentina did 10 years ago. No specialists are required to draw this conclusion.

Had Europe simply cut the Greeks loose when they strayed from their commitments, as outlined under the Maastricht Treaty, the EU might have maintained some credibility in its own fiscal responsibility.

Saving Greece is not about saving the euro. Nor can a plan to reduce debt to “only” 120% of GDP, over the next eight years, be taken seriously as a motivation for keeping Greece shackled to the EU. “This is simply the latest example of corrupt government operatives colluding with the financial elite to steal money, liberty and big chunks of ‘the pursuit of happiness’ from we the people.”

When the bank loans money to a homebuyer, the bank understands that it will receive either monthly interest payments, or the house itself. The borrower understands that he must either make monthly payments, or give the house to the bank. That’s the deal. It’s a contract. It’s not a moral obligation. Sovereign finance is not different. When banks loan money to a sovereign borrower, they understand it will receive interest payments for, as long as sovereign borrowers remains solvent, after that nothing. That’s the deal. It’s a contract, without a moral obligation. It is not the sovereign borrower’s fault that the banks didn’t demand a collateral before giving the loan. It is the lender’s responsibility to collateralize his loans, not the borrowers.

Most of the Greeks on the street understand this reality, which is why they would prefer a default to austerity. But the bankers have every interest in stopping the Greeks from going broke, which is why they pressured Papandreou into canceling his proposed referendum and replace him with a non-elected banker Papademos.

So Europe is deeply in trouble, which not many may realize at this stage. The problems stem from trillions of euro’s in European sovereign bonds plaguing the banks' balance sheets. When the euro was formed in January 1999, regulators wanted to develop the sovereign debt markets and promote tighter economic integration across Europe. To encourage banks to buy sovereign debt, they adjusted the reserve requirements for holding these bonds. Banks didn't have to set aside any capital to protect against potential losses in sovereign debt. In other words, the banks could lever up.

Meanwhile, the global central banks work together to solve Europe's problems by printing large quantities of money, consequently increasing inflation and reducing people’s purchasing power. Alternatively; what about liquidating real assets, perhaps some gold, to help fund the bailout? "German gold reserves must remain untouchable," said Germany's Economy Minister Philipp Roesler.

In other words Germany one of the world's economic powers is willing to print euro’s to save the EU, by completely debasing its currency, unwilling to sacrifice an ounce of gold. The irony is not lost, because the alternative is hyperinflation, which Germany strongly is against.

Saving Greece means avoiding a technical default, even though Greece has already defaulted in a real-world sense. Why is avoiding a technical default so important to the European Central Bank (ECB) and the International Monetary Fund (IMF)? This current action certainly looks like a default.

To everyone in this world with common sense, a non-voluntary 70% loss on their holdings of government bonds is a default. Now, oddly, Greece’s creditors are forced into accepting this not-a-default default losses option to save the banks that sold them the credit insurance in the event of a default. So they lose 70% of their capital and are denied any compensation from their default insurance they purchased. That is the same as an insurance company refuses to honor a fire insurance policy because only 70% of the house burned to the ground.

But the reality is: If Greece defaults, it sets a precedent for how other PIIGS countries might deal with unsustainable debt levels. This put at risk the security of Europe’s entire banking system.

Now you understand the basic problem: everyone else knows that if Greece officially defaults, the value of other government bonds in Spain, Italy, Ireland and Portugal will plummet too. A Greek default wouldn’t be important because of the size of the default, although French and German banks would stand to lose the most. The importance is; a default destroys most of Europe’s bank balance sheets.

If Europe’s Welfare State model is to survive, banks must not take losses on their government bond holdings. Individual and private investors, on the other hand, will be forced to take losses through a “collective action clause.” This clause allows their securities to be revalued without the owners’ consent if a majority of other bondholders agree to it.

The Eurocrats are at war with private investors. The credit insurance members are in the same club with the Eurocrats to preserve their system. This system is good for them to protect their jobs with excellent remunerations. Loaning money to the government is a good business, because collecting rent off the expansion of credit is easy money. That’s why they want the system to last as long as it can. For whom is the system not good? Everyone else on the outside, like private investors and taxpayers.

The austerity measures and debt reduction plans don’t really reduce debt it only reduces economic growth into a recession, increases unemployment, make people angry, and enhance the risk of riots.

Watch the video to better understand the Euro Soap.