Little wonder western powers would like to restrict Internet freedoms often citing a vague perceived threat of terrorism as an excuse.
With websites such as Politico reporting "Epstein also sexually trafficked the then-minor Jane Doe (a name used in US legal proceedings for people with anonymity), making her available for sex to politically connected and financially powerful people" the Palace was forced to speak out. "Epstein's purposes in 'lending' Jane Doe (along with other young girls) to such powerful people were to ingratiate himself with them for business, personal, political, and financial gain, as well as to obtain potential blackmail information."
Survivors of historical high-profile sex trafficking in the UK are struggling to receive justice, and more ‘victims’ are coming out of the woodwork all the time.
How deep into the British establishment does that child and sex abuse case run?
The Palace was forced into action Friday; if it had been possible the palace would have ignored the news hoping it went away.
The palace may have been forced to acknowledge the news but doing so confirms this matter is serious.
News Au goes for a sensationalist "PRINCE Andrew has been named in a US court filing by a woman who claims she was kept as an under-aged “sex slave” by a billionaire Wall Street financier."